Below
is a press release describing the meeting issued by the Forum
for Collaborative HIV Research. Combination regimens of agents
targeting different steps of the HCV lifecycle resemble antiretroviral
therapy for HIV, and many HIV positive people are coinfected
with hepatitis C, leading to increased collaboration among clinicians
and advocates focusing on the 2 diseases.
Hepatitis
Experts Create Roadmap for Accelerating the Development of
Targeted Therapies for Hepatitis C Virus
Washington, DC -- December 14, 2010 -- To improve the care
for individuals infected with the hepatitis C virus, a major
health problem and a leading cause of chronic liver disease
around the world, nearly 200 international hepatitis experts
have taken an important step in escalating the introduction
of a new class of targeted therapies for HCV -- direct-acting
antivirals (DAAs).
December 6 at a major scientific meeting -- Advancing HCV
Drug Development: A Collaborative Approach -- convened
by the Forum for Collaborative HIV Research, researchers,
hepatitis advocates, members of industry and representatives
from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European
Medicines Agency (EMA) created the roadmap for accelerating
the development of DAAs, agreeing that this new class of drugs
targeting specific hepatitis C virus proteins has the same
potential to improve treatment outcomes for people with HCV
as antiretroviral drugs changed the standard of care in HIV.
Currently, two DAA compounds have advanced into phase 3 development
in the United State and EU, and many more are in phase 2 trials
and likely to advance to phase 3 research in the near future.
"If there was ever a time when we can change the course
of HCV, it is now," said Veronica Miller, PhD, Director
of the Forum. "We are now where we were with HIV more
than a decade ago and can apply many of the lessons learned
from HIV drug development to significantly accelerate the
progress in bringing new and better HCV therapies to market."
DAAs directly attack the ability of the hepatitis C virus
to replicate and can increase the cure rate in certain HCV
patients to between 60 and 70 percent -- a major advance over
the 40 percent success rate associated with the currently
recommended treatment for chronic HCV infection, the combination
of pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Although the first
DAAs still require concomitant use with current HCV medications,
these new compounds will shorten the length of time on pegylated
interferon and ribavirin therapy, which hepatitis specialists
noted is often difficult to tolerate and has significant adverse
event profiles that limit treatment in many patients. According
to the latest data, between 15 and 30 percent of HCV patients
started on current HCV therapy are unable to complete the
year of treatment now required because they cannot tolerate
the side effects.
Charting the future of HCV drug development, the meeting participants
applied FDA's new guidance on conducting clinical trials on
DAAs, which was issued in September 2010 in draft form and
expected to be finalized in 2011. According to Jeffrey S.
Murray, MD, MPH, Deputy Director of the Division of Antiviral
Drug Products in FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
the draft guidance follows the same approach FDA uses in developing
HIV and oncology drugs. For early clinical testing, FDA recognizes
that most if not all DAAs for HCV will be used in combination
with other approved drug and therefore, recommends studies
examining the relationship between the new DAA agent and both
pegylated interferon and ribavirin as well as testing the
combination antiviral activity. FDA's draft guidance also
calls for using the results from proof-in-concept trials (meaning
a study in HCV infected patients that demonstrates initial
activity as measured by reductions in the HCV viral load)
to guide dose selection for subsequent Phase 2 trials in which
DAAs are studied for longer durations as part of a combination
regimen. FDA is further encouraging drug sponsors to design
development plans for combinations of two or more DAAs.
"The good news for the HCV community is that more drugs
are coming," said Jur Strobos, MD, JD, FACEP, Deputy
Director of the Forum. "The bad news is we don't know
how to combine them and that is what we need to study."
With FDA's guidance as the framework, the hepatitis experts
also identified the major factors researchers must take into
account when designing clinical trials for DAAs and other
new HCV therapies. Among the major issues cited are the emergence
of resistant virus and its potential management, and including
in future DAA clinical trials those special populations with
significant unmet needs in HCV therapy. These patients include
individuals co-infected with HIV, liver transplant recipients,
patients with decompensated cirrhosis, opioid users and those
on opiate substitution therapy, and children. According to
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), between
5 and 6 percent of infants born to HCV infected women contract
the infection from their mothers and the majority of those
infants will develop a chronic infection.
Focusing on the special needs of pediatric patients, leaders
from both FDA and EMA agreed that the time to start investigating
DAAs in children is when sufficient safety data exist in adults.
As explained by specialists in pediatric liver disease, children
with HCV often tolerate drug therapy better than adults, which
is why the ideal age to start children in pediatric trials
for DAAs is when they are 3 years old. According to hepatitis
experts, the beneficial impact of a "cure" for children,
preferably before they start school, cannot be overestimated.
Reducing Disparities in HCV Clinical Trials
Because identifying potential differences among groups treated
with a therapeutic regimen is an important goal of human studies,
the HCV community singled out the under-representation of
women, older people and different ethnic subgroups in clinical
trials as the problem requiring immediate attention and change
at a systemic level. Although there is a higher prevalence
of HCV in men than women, women metabolize HCV drugs differently
and are more affected by autoimmune diseases, which share
similar symptoms with HCV. Women also are twice as likely
as men to suffer from depression, which is a common side effect
of treatment with HCV medications.
Even more challenging for the HCV community is increasing
the representation of older HCV-infected adults in HCV clinical
trials, even though Baby Boomers constitute the majority of
hepatitis C infections in the United States and are often
less responsive than younger generations to antiviral treatment.
Compounding the problem, older HCV patients are more difficult
to treat, due to the increased prevalence of co-morbid conditions,
such as diabetes, dyslipidemia, and other metabolic conditions
that are correlated to chronic liver disease. Aging is also
strongly associated with liver fibrosis progression, which
means older HCV patients are likely to have advanced liver
disease and a high risk for impending liver complications.
But despite this reality, few studies have examined the age-specific
factors of chronic HCV infection and the clinical management
of the infection in this patient population.
More than an issue of fairness, HCV experts associate better
designed clinical research studies with the increased ability
of scientists to catalog and understand the influence of genetic
and non-genetic factors on individual and group responses
to new treatments. Findings from the large amount of genetic
data generated to date show that more than 90 percent of the
observed genetic variations occur within, rather than between
groups. This underscores the fact that gender and ethnicity
have biomedical consequences when evaluating patients with
more resistant virus and with more severe disease.
Designing the Research Roadmap to Address a Growing Public
Health Threat
Accelerating the development of DAAs to improve HCV treatment
outcomes is especially warranted now that the hepatitis C
virus has become the most common chronic blood borne infection
in the U.S. According to new government estimates, approximately
4.1 million Americans are infected with HCV, of whom 60 to
70 percent will develop chronic liver disease. Currently,
almost half of all liver transplants in the U.S. are performed
for end-stage hepatitis C. Moreover, because liver disease
is one of the leading causes of death in the U.S., the CDC
predicts that deaths from chronic liver disease attributed
to hepatitis C will double or triple over the next 15 to 20
years.
To change these statistics, hepatitis specialists focused
on ways to advance HCV drug development so DAAs and other
new classes of drugs for HCV can reach the market quickly.
Here, the experts reached agreement on a number of issues:
 |
Exposure
to new single agents -- because HCV remains sensitive
to ribavirin and pegylated interferon, longer initial
studies may be recommended to evaluate single drugs and
novel combinations of drugs. |
 |
Composition
of patients in early studies (phase 1 and 2a) -- early
studies should be large enough so results with one type
of virus or one group of patients can be easily discerned.
Focusing on specific genetic sub-populations will also
ensure that early studies do not produce confusing results. |
 |
Drug
resistance in HCV patients -- unlike HIV, drug resistance
in HCV may not be as large a concern because HCV does
not integrate into host DNA as HIV does. Thus, resistant
strains are not archived and there is the potential that
resistant patients can be retreated with different combinations
regimens, as and when they become available. |
 |
Baseline
parameters -- there is the need to develop predictive
algorithms based on baseline characteristics such as gender,
body weight, HCV genotypes and subtypes |
 |
Exclusion
of former and current drug users in clinical trials --
exclusion is unnecessary and does not serve the field
well. Over 60 percent of patients with HCV are infected
through drug use, indicating the need to have quality
data to guide treatment decisions in this patient population |
As
a next step, the Forum for Collaborative HIV Research will
publish the consensus of this scientific meeting to advance
the research agenda. Once published, the report will be distributed
widely to the Forum's many constituencies -- government, industry,
patient advocates, healthcare providers, foundations, health
insurers and academia -- with the goal of advancing research
on HCV and driving public policy.
About the Forum for Collaborative HIV Research
Now part of the University of California (UC), Berkeley School
of Public Health and based in Washington, DC, the Forum was
founded in 1997 as the outgrowth of a White House initiative
which called for an ongoing collaboration among stakeholders
to address emerging issues in HIV/AIDS and set the research
strategy. Representing government, industry, patient advocates,
healthcare providers, foundations and academia, the Forum
is a public/private partnership that is guided by an Executive
Committee that sets the research agenda. The Forum organizes
roundtables and issues reports on a range of global HIV/AIDS
issues, including treatment-related toxicities, immune-based
therapies, health services research, co-infections, prevention,
and the transference of research results into care. Forum
recommendations have changed how clinical trials are conducted,
accelerated the delivery of new classes of drugs, heightened
awareness of TB/HIV co-infection, and helped to spur national
momentum toward universal testing for HIV. For more information,
see http://www.hivforum.org
1/7/11
Source
Forum
for Collaborative HIV Research. Hepatitis Experts Create Roadmap
for Accelerating the Development of Targeted Therapies for Hepatitis
C Virus. Press release. December 14, 2010.
|
|
|
|